Be wary of toxic stationery against children
Recently, the experimental video of the online "correction solution for 3 minutes of poisoning mice" has sparked heated discussion. In order to verify the authenticity, the Beijing News reporter randomly purchased four kinds of correction fluids and two kinds of correction tapes. According to the professional tests, all the four correction fluids detected trichloroethane, and the benzene content exceeded the standard seriously. The correction fluid of the formula also exceeded the standard by nearly 4 times. Formaldehyde is also detected in the correction zone, and the potentially radioactive zirconium and hafnium substances also add some hidden dangers to the six samples.
In fact, the benzene content in the correction fluid exceeded the standard, which is already an old problem. In the student stationery inspection in Shenzhen in 2007, the organic solvent benzene content of some stationery exceeded the standard by 20 to 30 times. In the quality inspection of students in Changchun City in 2011, the total unqualified rate reached 10%, and the benzene content in the correction fluid exceeded one of the main problems. Correction fluid, the student's standing learning equipment, its safety status can be described as completely out of control.
In developed countries, student supplies are often implemented with a safety mark system, such as the American Society of Art and Creative Materials, which is non-toxic for children's art supplies. However, in China, inferior products that violate the national standard are still flooding the market. It is said that the mandatory national standard “General Requirements for the Safety of Student Supplies†promulgated in 2008 has already imposed strict restrictions on modified products such as correction fluids. But obviously, in some places, "student supplies that do not meet technical specifications and safety standards will not be sold in the market" has become an empty talk.
What should I care about for student supplies? Because unlike adults, no one can predict how children will treat their stationery. For example, in the national standard, an air passage of at least 6.8 square millimeters is required on the cap. This rule is very "realistic". It is to prevent the child from inadvertently eating the cap and blocking the trachea. The cap has a ventilation channel to reduce the risk of suffocation. In the same way, correction fluids, which may be in contact with students' hands, face, eyes, nose and mouth, etc., are not excessively considered regardless of their potential risks.
It should be known that the DBP of the plasticizer component of the alcoholic liquor is only 2.6 times higher than the standard, and it has instantly become the target of public criticism. Nowadays, the correction fluid in children's hands exceeds the standard by nearly 7 times. In the closed classroom, there is no risk of chronic benzene poisoning. Is it true that the health of the minors is not as important as the "drinkers"?
Pastry Tools,Baking Tools,Cake Decorating Tools,Cake Decorating Kit
Xiongyang Household Co., Ltd , https://www.xyknives.com